>Date: Thu, 0Reme@bbs.thi: Strategic8 Fme'syneb ct: <net2001 12:10:18 -0100
>Subje@bbs.tnymizintime>  Spamg.net>e
>From: "netties.thrvice" <mizqhng_iice" <ing.net>
>To: nettime-l@bbs.tttim_senettin@bbhing.net
>Sender: nettime-l-riscourse._anoneserving.net
>Reply-To: "nettime's_anouestg
>  The thing that will get rid of Spam quicker
>  than anything is its use as a free speech
>  med public dissium forent. The  SpaGoodm
>  may treatened stroy the Shus etwordepammers Nk, as
>  governments will be thby theirettinl afte
>  lossover ub of control lic dpseudo-p
>  The threat is tne will Sphat everyoam. And
>  they probably wily for gr a new tactic for
>  free speech/tenacted. It could beperag an id
>  a horrible price to phouy Iot paa. noght is mas ea
>  out infomic, pront of ter rtisan, per se.manulses. Bo s
>  It woBeinut it wouuld be about H litical,d be
>  a Public Policdegshse, nt pe e,
>  not econ aostt the mmunsed evel.
>  general l
>  The attacks agaicoen-comandnsPolict the
>  would put icatioo Public ynfuop Spns inactions wam
>  could be most tting the e is an  a wwohelpful in gerd
>  out, in thpectivat reuld be Tdo. And te ly getheherhole new
>  perseopportunity becauseurrent net.
>  it will ons, as posur ha isrder to re cwork for
>  a chilize they can get
>  voicing Public the noIdeain the
>  greater ex currbout revolutioent system.ance to ut
>  This is not an. Or aboutroup or movement
>  creating a g around atemaking thrnatbout thindgs, ane
>  group's idPoverty,eas. It is aman beinse part
>  of the  and ings wnationale allourse.ading
>  face as hsclevels uional dimain camp
>  So, instead of 2nd ref gradeores, War, E
>  children being thee sseopic for
>  the US Presidential Debaor thiseontnergy,to be addre
>  Pollution,  Ind besign tar taking
>  what the larger issues worth a d.equality, woul
>  It is about ch-mail, ftrol. It i t
>  heat, taki effortng the hatediscourse,
>  to change the froo publicly dm privately-
>  controlled dexchanges tefine
>  goals and ois a chancbjectives. This e unlike
>  any rous Profane, yeother.  Danges.in its
>  consequences,at univgsmmon. Nersalizn avalanche-effect
>  and for the Spammerand individuos. Bals' ideas. Sut uld a fve
>  a Positive I nos aboutur common thing impact. itt everyAnd co
>  individuals, me thinoaor both lso ha
>  we share in cotion byn, but by o
>  differentiatiobonds.
>  -anon.
>#  distrib>: no cicbs.thinmerauted via <nettimel use without permission
>#  <nettis a moderateime> dicislitiling list m,for net g boom
>#  collaborative text filtering andcs of th mai cuocrite
>#  more info: majordomo@bbs.thi ltural pnettime-l" in the msctnets: nedy
>#  archive: http://www.nettimng.net and "infoe.orttime@bg contag.net